Should abstract artworks be explained?

This is a good question! For the purpose of the artist statement to go with an abstract painting, some form of information needs to be shared, such as what the artist wanted to convey and the thoughts behind it. However, this can also be done in the title.  But if the title is vague itself, e.g.‘Number 6’ then it may be warranted, but not essential. Abstract art in nature is abstract and is interpreted by the viewer, bringing their own observations, experiences and feelings to the interpretation. It does, however, sometimes help knowing the direction it is being taken in and so the artist can reveal as much as they want.  Often it is the intrigue and mystery that is captivating in abstract works. 

Recently an exhibition judge came up to me to discuss my abstract artwork.  She said she was captivated by it and kept having to come back for another look. She said this was a good sign and a reaction which one would want for a successful abstract painting. The title gave some information, but not all was revealed, leaving it up to the viewer to interpret. This was its charm! The title piqued one’s curiosity, but you had to make connections yourself to fully appreciate it. 

In the statement that goes with ‘Even in the tiniest of spaces…’ in the shop on my website, I originally explained my motivation for each shape and idea etc, and provided an in-depth analysis of it… but then I removed most of it, wanting the viewer to interpret it in any way they wished. I only provided the breadcrumbs, and the viewer must do the rest. That is the joy of it! 

Until next time 😊

Michele